<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Review Template</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews, Cigar Industry News, Smoking Ban Watch and a little about Libations and Food.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>I noticed a couple of votes saying they do not like the new layout for the reviews. I&#039;d be interested in hearing you opinions on why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed a couple of votes saying they do not like the new layout for the reviews. I&#8217;d be interested in hearing you opinions on why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>Matt: I just posted my first review and I don&#039;t think it prevents the story behind the cigar really.  The description section can easily allow for it if so desired. :)  I really like the new format as well, mostly for the reasons Ryan and Brian already pointed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: I just posted my first review and I don&#8217;t think it prevents the story behind the cigar really.  The description section can easily allow for it if so desired. :)  I really like the new format as well, mostly for the reasons Ryan and Brian already pointed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve written about six reviews so far with the new template. (Some are not published yet) I&#039;m really liking it so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written about six reviews so far with the new template. (Some are not published yet) I&#8217;m really liking it so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Caruso (The Daily Doormatt)</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Caruso (The Daily Doormatt)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Do you think the new format prevents you from telling the story behind the cigar?  It&#039;s more readible and easier to digest.  Your reviews are always spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think the new format prevents you from telling the story behind the cigar?  It&#8217;s more readible and easier to digest.  Your reviews are always spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback. I&#039;ve added a couple things to the finished version if you take a look at the latest review you can see them. I added a Price and a link to purchase them. I&#039;m debating about going back through some of my old reviews and reformatting them like this over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback. I&#8217;ve added a couple things to the finished version if you take a look at the latest review you can see them. I added a Price and a link to purchase them. I&#8217;m debating about going back through some of my old reviews and reformatting them like this over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeDrinker</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeDrinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/#comment-999</guid>
		<description>It makes it easy to scan and compare with other reviews, if necessary. plus, the bullet-point format will be easier to remember than the same details in paragraph format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes it easy to scan and compare with other reviews, if necessary. plus, the bullet-point format will be easier to remember than the same details in paragraph format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/#comment-988</guid>
		<description>Looks good! I&#039;m very much in favor of reviews with clear sections. It makes it easier to scan to exactly what you&#039;re interested in reading about, if you&#039;re in a hurry.  

I&#039;m with Ryan on the &quot;Similar Cigars&quot; sections, that&#039;s a great idea. Of course, you gotta have the &quot;Verdict&quot; and I&#039;m a fan of having the cigar stats right up front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good! I&#8217;m very much in favor of reviews with clear sections. It makes it easier to scan to exactly what you&#8217;re interested in reading about, if you&#8217;re in a hurry.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Ryan on the &#8220;Similar Cigars&#8221; sections, that&#8217;s a great idea. Of course, you gotta have the &#8220;Verdict&#8221; and I&#8217;m a fan of having the cigar stats right up front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/comment-page-1/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/08/08/new-review-template/#comment-986</guid>
		<description>I like the new format - esp. the &quot;Verdict&quot; and &quot;Similar Cigars&quot; part - most helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new format &#8211; esp. the &#8220;Verdict&#8221; and &#8220;Similar Cigars&#8221; part &#8211; most helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

