<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: La Aroma de Cuba Cigar Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews, Cigar Industry News, Smoking Ban Watch and a little about Libations and Food.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: La Aroma de Cuba Review &#124; Oak and Smoke</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4880</link>
		<dc:creator>La Aroma de Cuba Review &#124; Oak and Smoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/#comment-4880</guid>
		<description>[...] all the way around from start to finish. That&#8217;s were I wish I had the camera, to show Daniel over at CigarJack that there is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all the way around from start to finish. That&#8217;s were I wish I had the camera, to show Daniel over at CigarJack that there is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodger Fussell</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2877</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodger Fussell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/#comment-2877</guid>
		<description>Am on second box of these. They are &quot;fussy&quot; as you stated, but the flavor and aroma are addictive. I was hoping the second box would improve, but alas, no.  Tks.. Rodger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am on second box of these. They are &#8220;fussy&#8221; as you stated, but the flavor and aroma are addictive. I was hoping the second box would improve, but alas, no.  Tks.. Rodger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar of the Week: La Aroma de Cuba Robusto &#187; Daniel B. Honigman&#8217;s site (Chicago 2016 news, epicure, cigar reviews, etc.)</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar of the Week: La Aroma de Cuba Robusto &#187; Daniel B. Honigman&#8217;s site (Chicago 2016 news, epicure, cigar reviews, etc.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>[...] This review originally appeared on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This review originally appeared on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Everyone Smoking? November 17th Edition &#124; Cigar Jack's Cigar Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Everyone Smoking? November 17th Edition &#124; Cigar Jack's Cigar Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/#comment-2307</guid>
		<description>[...] La Aroma de Cuba Cigar Review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] La Aroma de Cuba Cigar Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel B. Honigman</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel B. Honigman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>Whew. So it &lt;i&gt;wasn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; just me.

And yes, Dandyman. That was cheesy. Boooo. (Kidding.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew. So it <i>wasn&#8217;t</i> just me.</p>
<p>And yes, Dandyman. That was cheesy. Boooo. (Kidding.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dandyman</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>dandyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>Welcome Dan.  I&#039;ve got to say that I was actually afraid to read you review.  Not because it wasn&#039;t Jesse writing it, but because it just happens to be one of my personal favorites.  I&#039;ve probably smoked a box and a half of these over the past year and I never tire of them.  That being said, I wish I could disagree with you, but alas I cannot.  While Jesse is right about the Churchill&#039;s being a little better, the draw on these tend to be tight and the burn varies between &quot;slighly off-kilter&quot; and &quot;way out of whack&quot;.  The only reason I can give for why I keep coming back is the taste.  For a medium-bodied cigar, they have a great almond flavor that I absolutely love.  I&#039;m a total almond nut (heh, really that was unintentional) and the minute I tried one of these, I was hooked.  Every time I give one of these away, I get the same report back, &quot;Great taste, but a bit fussy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome Dan.  I&#8217;ve got to say that I was actually afraid to read you review.  Not because it wasn&#8217;t Jesse writing it, but because it just happens to be one of my personal favorites.  I&#8217;ve probably smoked a box and a half of these over the past year and I never tire of them.  That being said, I wish I could disagree with you, but alas I cannot.  While Jesse is right about the Churchill&#8217;s being a little better, the draw on these tend to be tight and the burn varies between &#8220;slighly off-kilter&#8221; and &#8220;way out of whack&#8221;.  The only reason I can give for why I keep coming back is the taste.  For a medium-bodied cigar, they have a great almond flavor that I absolutely love.  I&#8217;m a total almond nut (heh, really that was unintentional) and the minute I tried one of these, I was hooked.  Every time I give one of these away, I get the same report back, &#8220;Great taste, but a bit fussy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2264</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2007/11/14/la-aroma-de-cuba-cigar-review/#comment-2264</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve smoked a few of these in the past and found the  Cetro and Corona Minor sizes to smoke a bit better, but sometimes they do tend to be a little tight so are best stored at an RH around 65%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve smoked a few of these in the past and found the  Cetro and Corona Minor sizes to smoke a bit better, but sometimes they do tend to be a little tight so are best stored at an RH around 65%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
