<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Illusione No 2 Cigar Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews, Cigar Industry News, Smoking Ban Watch and a little about Libations and Food.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:57:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-9065</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/#comment-9065</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t believe the short-filler rumors. I (and I&#039;m not the only one) cut open a CG:4 last summer to find out for myself and found nothing but longfiller leaves. 
This is a great, padron-like smoke with a cleaner finish and more complexity. Worth every penny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t believe the short-filler rumors. I (and I&#8217;m not the only one) cut open a CG:4 last summer to find out for myself and found nothing but longfiller leaves.<br />
This is a great, padron-like smoke with a cleaner finish and more complexity. Worth every penny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimon</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-8728</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/#comment-8728</guid>
		<description>Interesting your comment about spice. I hate pepper/spice in my cigars.. The cigar I had has 0 spice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting your comment about spice. I hate pepper/spice in my cigars.. The cigar I had has 0 spice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AImon</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-8727</link>
		<dc:creator>AImon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/#comment-8727</guid>
		<description>This is a great tasting Cigar.. But a bit prcey for a short filler. Yes that&#039;s right.. its not a long filler cigar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great tasting Cigar.. But a bit prcey for a short filler. Yes that&#8217;s right.. its not a long filler cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-7205</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/#comment-7205</guid>
		<description>I LOVE THIS CIGAR LOOK AT MY REVIEWS ABOUT THEM ANYWAY I NEVER HAD THE #2 I HAD HAVE NOW A BOX OF C/G4 888 AND MK AND THERE NOT THAT HARD TO FIND THERE COMMING OUT MORE AND MORE I HAD THEM WHEN THEY 1ST CAME OUT THEN I WAS HARD GETTING THEM NOW THERE NOT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE THIS CIGAR LOOK AT MY REVIEWS ABOUT THEM ANYWAY I NEVER HAD THE #2 I HAD HAVE NOW A BOX OF C/G4 888 AND MK AND THERE NOT THAT HARD TO FIND THERE COMMING OUT MORE AND MORE I HAD THEM WHEN THEY 1ST CAME OUT THEN I WAS HARD GETTING THEM NOW THERE NOT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Rums to Pair with Cigars &#124; Cigar Reviews and News at Cigar Jack's Cigar Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6519</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Rums to Pair with Cigars &#124; Cigar Reviews and News at Cigar Jack's Cigar Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/#comment-6519</guid>
		<description>[...] While technically a white rum it does have a bit of color to it. On the rocks it has light spiced honey flavor. I find it extreme refreshing and I&#8217;m actually having some while writing this with an Illusione No. 2. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While technically a white rum it does have a bit of color to it. On the rocks it has light spiced honey flavor. I find it extreme refreshing and I&#8217;m actually having some while writing this with an Illusione No. 2. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illusione Cigar Review &#171; Great Cigar Articles From The Web</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5537</link>
		<dc:creator>Illusione Cigar Review &#171; Great Cigar Articles From The Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/03/illusione-no-2-cigar-review/#comment-5537</guid>
		<description>[...] review of a cigar I haven&#8217;t heard of until now. This morning he published a review of the Illusione No 2. While you&#8217;re over there check out his month long contest.     Posted by Stogie Lover Filed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] review of a cigar I haven&#8217;t heard of until now. This morning he published a review of the Illusione No 2. While you&#8217;re over there check out his month long contest.     Posted by Stogie Lover Filed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
