« The Cigar Smoker’s Journey | Home | Cuba Libre Magnum Cigar Review »

Cusano 18 Double Connecticut Cigar Review

By Jesse | March 23, 2008 |

Jason Shaffer submitted this great review as part of our Anniversary Bash.

Today I smoked a one year-old Cusano 18 Double Connecticut. See how it stacked up against one I smoked about a year ago:

Here’s the story. About a year ago I smoked a Cusano 18 Double Connecticut Natural. For those of you who don’t know, this cigar is made with 18 year-old filler tobacco that was left over from some experimental wrapper leaf grown in the Dominican Republic way back when. I thought it was a pretty good, smooth smoke the first time I had it. Its main downfall was the harsh, almost “chemical” aftertaste that it left on my palate. I figured that some time in my coolerdoor might do it some good, so I left the box of 20-minus-one to sleep in my coolerdoor and forgot about it.

A year later (more or less) and here I am looking for a smoke to review. I skimmed over a couple Fuente boxes and came across this old box of Cusano’s. And I remembered my little experiment. I decided I’d pick up one of these sticks and give it a second look.

Here’s the review:

Cusano 18 Double Connecticut

Vital Stats

Pre-Smoke

The Double Connecticut comes in boxes of 20 and each stick comes wrapped in cellophane. Upon removal of the plastic, it becomes evident that this is a very nice looking cigar. It has a smooth wrapper with a nice feel to it. It almost reminds me of swede. It isn’t toothy and has very few, if any veins running its length. It is pretty firm, but not overly packed with tobacco. It has a very large cap that should be quite hard to damage during the cut. The stick isn’t lumpy or uneven, and appears to be free of defect.

When I bring the foot of the cigar to my nose I get sweet cappuccino scents and almost a creamy vanilla bean character. It definitely entices the senses. The head clips easily and cleanly with my Cuban Crafter’s cutter (soon to be replaced by a Palio). The pre-light draw brings forth the same sweet cappuccino and vanilla notes as before. I’m looking forward to toasting this stogie.

Lighting Up

It only takes three wooden matches to get the foot of this cigar going. It is producing copious amounts of thick white smoke. The draw feels pretty moderate in my mouth, but the impression is that it is looser than it really is. I attribute this to the large amount of easy smoke this cigar produces.

The initial flavors of vanilla and light cappuccino come through even stronger during this first third of the cigar. The word “creamy” comes to mind when describing the feel on my palate. I get a slight “tingly”, peppery sensation on my lips and it seems to complement the rich creaminess of the cigar. The burn is pretty even, if not a little fast at the moment. There are also hints of distinct tobacco coming through.

Second Third

As the cigar progresses I begin to get some definite cedar notes at first. It begins to shift to a fresh oak or even maple aroma. It almost brings forth some thoughts of maple syrup. This is all probably due to the underlying sweetness of the cigar. It’s not an “in-your-face” processed white sugar sweetness, more of a natural cane sugar sweet. I also start to get some hazelnut notes. The cigar honestly reminds me of a creamy, frothy, smooth, hazelnut cappuccino. One thing to note, this is burning quickly, but really not all that hot. I’ll just have to slow down a bit.

Final Third

For its last third the cigar definitely looses is cedar and wood dimension and begins a sort of toasty spice flavor. By the end, the cigar just becomes downright bitter, and returns to that chemical aftertaste that I unfortunately had with my first experience with this cigar a year ago. All of the sweet creaminess that the cigar possessed early on has all but vanished and I end up putting this cigar down slightly past the band.

Bottom Line

For the most part, this was a good smoke. It was not entirely complex and the “hazelnut cappuccino” flavor that I used to describe its base remained for the majority of the cigar. This stick did benefit from some age. It was much smoother this time around. This was certainly a mild smoke, something that I would recommend as a good morning stick (maybe with a cappuccino?) or a good cigar for someone just getting into the habit – *cough* – hobby. One cannot overlook the price tag also. At under $4 a stick, this is certainly something that everyone should try at least once.

Overall: 6 out of 10, BUY

Popularity: 12% [?]

Tags: , , ,

Topics: Cigar Reviews | No Comments »

Comments

Comment Policy

Additional comments powered by BackType

RSS Feed Subscribe




    Recent Comments

  • DanielHonigman: Of course, Twtvite goes down. Check this out for info about the Chicago Cigar Tweetup on March 25: h ...
  • kwikmedicine: CigarChat Cigar Review: Jameson Cigars Declaration Iniquity http://bit.ly/aOgDI3 This comment was or ...
  • CigarOmarr: @cigarjack CigarChat Cigar Review: Jameson Cigars Declaration Iniquity: Thanks to Jameson Cigars for ...
  • DanielHonigman: Here are your reviews of the Declaration: http://bit.ly/cq846a #cigarchat This comment was originall ...
  • cigars_online: CigarChat Cigar Review: Jameson Cigars Declaration Iniquity: Thanks to Jameson Cigars for sponsoring ...


Alltop, confirmation that we kick ass


Cigar Topsite - Cigar Review Blogs, Cigar Retailers, Cigar News & Information Websites
Shopping Blog Directory