<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cusano 18 Double Connecticut Cigar Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/23/cusano-18-double-connecticut-cigar-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/23/cusano-18-double-connecticut-cigar-review/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews, Cigar Industry News, Smoking Ban Watch and a little about Libations and Food.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/23/cusano-18-double-connecticut-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-10321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 05:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/23/cusano-18-double-connecticut-cigar-review/#comment-10321</guid>
		<description>March 23rd 2008 huh? Wow!!! I am smoking one right now, fresh out of the celophane. It is 2010. I am about to the last third now &amp; I have noticed no unpleasant change. I was on light up a little disapointing but came out of it after about the first 1/2 inch or so and kept getting better so far. The prices you quoted peeked my interest so I found out when this was written. I buy from a place that has very reasonable prices, I see you had the 5X50 Robusto, I am smokung the 7.25 X 50 Churchill. (I know that length &amp; ring guage can make a big difference on a cigars traits and characteristics.)But the price for a box(Which comes in 18 per box, not sure if they changed that or you misstated.)for $112 a box. I got mine as part of a sampler for a lot cheaper than that. Well I am to the band and it has changed some but it not at all unpleasant yet.

   Just my 2 cents worth. B.T.W. you gave a REALLY great review.

Sincerely, Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 23rd 2008 huh? Wow!!! I am smoking one right now, fresh out of the celophane. It is 2010. I am about to the last third now &amp; I have noticed no unpleasant change. I was on light up a little disapointing but came out of it after about the first 1/2 inch or so and kept getting better so far. The prices you quoted peeked my interest so I found out when this was written. I buy from a place that has very reasonable prices, I see you had the 5X50 Robusto, I am smokung the 7.25 X 50 Churchill. (I know that length &amp; ring guage can make a big difference on a cigars traits and characteristics.)But the price for a box(Which comes in 18 per box, not sure if they changed that or you misstated.)for $112 a box. I got mine as part of a sampler for a lot cheaper than that. Well I am to the band and it has changed some but it not at all unpleasant yet.</p>
<p>   Just my 2 cents worth. B.T.W. you gave a REALLY great review.</p>
<p>Sincerely, Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/23/cusano-18-double-connecticut-cigar-review/comment-page-1/#comment-10304</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/03/23/cusano-18-double-connecticut-cigar-review/#comment-10304</guid>
		<description>I must say, after reading a few reviews on this stick, I was less than enthusiastic about lighting it up. The first third was much as I expected, but then a strong note of sugar cane kicked in. It was not a overwhelming sweetness, but a subtle, sweet sugar cane continued through the second third, and the white ash clung for about half of the length. In the final third, the sweetness turned to a molasses note. I enjoyed the smoke very much, and would reccomend it for at least one smoke. it was a quick but very pleasant stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, after reading a few reviews on this stick, I was less than enthusiastic about lighting it up. The first third was much as I expected, but then a strong note of sugar cane kicked in. It was not a overwhelming sweetness, but a subtle, sweet sugar cane continued through the second third, and the white ash clung for about half of the length. In the final third, the sweetness turned to a molasses note. I enjoyed the smoke very much, and would reccomend it for at least one smoke. it was a quick but very pleasant stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

