<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cigar Review: Padron 6000 Maduro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews, Cigar Industry News, Smoking Ban Watch and a little about Libations and Food.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padron Series 3000 (Comparison Review) &#171; Keepers of the Flame</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/comment-page-1/#comment-6681</link>
		<dc:creator>Padron Series 3000 (Comparison Review) &#171; Keepers of the Flame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/#comment-6681</guid>
		<description>[...] does seem to be some inconsistency here &#8212; it isn&#8217;t severe, but as Jesse points out in his review of the Padron 6000 at Cigar Jack there may be some quality control issues to look out for. On the other hand, this is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] does seem to be some inconsistency here &#8212; it isn&#8217;t severe, but as Jesse points out in his review of the Padron 6000 at Cigar Jack there may be some quality control issues to look out for. On the other hand, this is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/comment-page-1/#comment-6660</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/#comment-6660</guid>
		<description>This wasn&#039;t storage or handling issues, these were obvious flaws in the cigar construction. So I don&#039;t think it would have mattered where I bought them. I even had one sent to me from across the country and it also looked bad for a Padron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This wasn&#8217;t storage or handling issues, these were obvious flaws in the cigar construction. So I don&#8217;t think it would have mattered where I bought them. I even had one sent to me from across the country and it also looked bad for a Padron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony rosen</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/comment-page-1/#comment-6659</link>
		<dc:creator>tony rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/#comment-6659</guid>
		<description>I agree that these cigars are very good. I would, however, try buying them elsewhere as I haven&#039;t had any issues with them. 

Sent from my mobile using FeedM8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that these cigars are very good. I would, however, try buying them elsewhere as I haven&#8217;t had any issues with them. </p>
<p>Sent from my mobile using FeedM8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cigar Spy</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/comment-page-1/#comment-6656</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cigar Spy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/06/19/cigar-review-padron-6000-maduro/#comment-6656</guid>
		<description>nice review =) and i agree with you the 3000 is one of the best in the series, its my favorite one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice review =) and i agree with you the 3000 is one of the best in the series, its my favorite one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

