<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cigar Review: 5 Vegas Miami Toro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/08/11/cigar-review-5-vegas-miami-toro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/08/11/cigar-review-5-vegas-miami-toro/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews, Cigar Industry News, Smoking Ban Watch and a little about Libations and Food.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Werner</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/08/11/cigar-review-5-vegas-miami-toro/comment-page-1/#comment-10344</link>
		<dc:creator>John Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 04:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/?p=1370#comment-10344</guid>
		<description>The 5 Vegas Miami is an affordable creation from Jose&#039; &quot;Don Pepin&quot; Garcia&#039;s Nicaurauguan factory.  Perhaps he made earlier ones in Miami and hence the name...I can&#039;t say I know that story.  But, this is a solid smoke and most folks can get it under $7, sometimes a good bit under.  The market needs good cigars at price points like this so it is with interest that I report on this stick.

The medium brown wrapper looked great with a good smoothness.  The pre-light smell was also good hinting at a bit of mocha in the mix.  I punched it, toasted it, and then rotated it as I began the draw which turned out excellent in resistence.  The taste was peppery at first and settle into good aged cedar right away.  While the cedar was the main component I experienced I would definitely say the leather like taste was smooth and not too earthy or pungent.  The pepper returned a bit now and then, yet wasn&#039;t ever as strong again as the initial spice.  The finish was a little like a toasted slightly sweet bread-like one that was pleasant and left no bitterness or pungency.  All-in-all, this cigar wasn&#039;t too strong, wasn&#039;t too spicy, tasted good - yet, wasn&#039;t particulary complex as the primary impression was aged cedar and a clean finish.  The ash was a beautiful light grey.  The foot was noticably a bit softer than the body of the cigar still the ash held to about an inch and a half showing pretty good density with not heavy veining.  I enjoyed this cigar and I think it&#039;s a solid bet at well under the $10 mark.  I guess Don Pepin makes quite a few stronger sticks, but they cost several dollars more generally and this is a compelling price and taste profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 5 Vegas Miami is an affordable creation from Jose&#8217; &#8220;Don Pepin&#8221; Garcia&#8217;s Nicaurauguan factory.  Perhaps he made earlier ones in Miami and hence the name&#8230;I can&#8217;t say I know that story.  But, this is a solid smoke and most folks can get it under $7, sometimes a good bit under.  The market needs good cigars at price points like this so it is with interest that I report on this stick.</p>
<p>The medium brown wrapper looked great with a good smoothness.  The pre-light smell was also good hinting at a bit of mocha in the mix.  I punched it, toasted it, and then rotated it as I began the draw which turned out excellent in resistence.  The taste was peppery at first and settle into good aged cedar right away.  While the cedar was the main component I experienced I would definitely say the leather like taste was smooth and not too earthy or pungent.  The pepper returned a bit now and then, yet wasn&#8217;t ever as strong again as the initial spice.  The finish was a little like a toasted slightly sweet bread-like one that was pleasant and left no bitterness or pungency.  All-in-all, this cigar wasn&#8217;t too strong, wasn&#8217;t too spicy, tasted good &#8211; yet, wasn&#8217;t particulary complex as the primary impression was aged cedar and a clean finish.  The ash was a beautiful light grey.  The foot was noticably a bit softer than the body of the cigar still the ash held to about an inch and a half showing pretty good density with not heavy veining.  I enjoyed this cigar and I think it&#8217;s a solid bet at well under the $10 mark.  I guess Don Pepin makes quite a few stronger sticks, but they cost several dollars more generally and this is a compelling price and taste profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel S. M.</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/08/11/cigar-review-5-vegas-miami-toro/comment-page-1/#comment-8564</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel S. M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/?p=1370#comment-8564</guid>
		<description>I ended up with a cinco vegas humidor with 10 of each main blends, Serie &quot;A&quot;, Classic and Gold. I love them but I have some serious complaints. When then burn properly and you can draw through them, in my mind they are a fantastic smoke. But out of each blend i&#039;ve had to throw at least 2-3 away because i couldnt get any draw(or had to draw so hard my cheeks hurt) or they burned improperly. It&#039;s dissapointing because i&#039;ve heard many good things about them but these construction issues may have put me to the point where I will most likely no longer buy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ended up with a cinco vegas humidor with 10 of each main blends, Serie &#8220;A&#8221;, Classic and Gold. I love them but I have some serious complaints. When then burn properly and you can draw through them, in my mind they are a fantastic smoke. But out of each blend i&#8217;ve had to throw at least 2-3 away because i couldnt get any draw(or had to draw so hard my cheeks hurt) or they burned improperly. It&#8217;s dissapointing because i&#8217;ve heard many good things about them but these construction issues may have put me to the point where I will most likely no longer buy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CXIII</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/08/11/cigar-review-5-vegas-miami-toro/comment-page-1/#comment-7455</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CXIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/?p=1370#comment-7455</guid>
		<description>[...] Stogie Review smokes the VigilantE. Keepers of the Flame checks out the Reyes Family Premier. Cigar Jack tries the 5 Vegas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stogie Review smokes the VigilantE. Keepers of the Flame checks out the Reyes Family Premier. Cigar Jack tries the 5 Vegas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa B.</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarjack.net/2008/08/11/cigar-review-5-vegas-miami-toro/comment-page-1/#comment-7438</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cigarjack.net/?p=1370#comment-7438</guid>
		<description>Jesse, the last time I smoked one of these cigars I wasn&#039;t too impressed with it. I&#039;ll have to give it another go to confirm my opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, the last time I smoked one of these cigars I wasn&#8217;t too impressed with it. I&#8217;ll have to give it another go to confirm my opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

